Monday, April 18, 2022

The 1981 Listening Post - John Entwistle - Too Late the Hero

 John Entwistle - Too Late the Hero


#548

November 23 1981

John Entwistle

Too Late the Hero

Genre: Wait…you gave The Who’s BASSIST a record deal?!?

1.25 out of 5




Lowlights:

Dancing Master


“Boris the Spider”.

That’s the only song by John Entwhistle that the world ever needed.

Need proof?

Listen to this record. 


Jeez, what I do for this project.


This album is terrible and everyone who was involved, from the A&R people to the people who bought it should be ashamed of themselves. This album is why Rock got a bad name.


There is a song called “Sleeping Man” and I’m pretty sure John was trolling everyone at this point. He will never be forgiven for “Dancing Master”.

Someone listen to “Love is a Heart Attack” and tell me what song I think I’m hearing, cuz I can’t recall. I feel like it’s an interpolation of a Peter Gabriel thing but I can’t be sure. 


You remember that manager that Jimmy Fallon played in “Almost Famous”? He’s the guy responsible for this jackassery. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCDZZ_BPTcs

The 1981 Listening Post - Men at Work - Business As Usual

 Men at Work - Business As Usual



#547

By Christopher Loff

November 9 1981

Men at Work

Business As Usual

Allen’s Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Christopher’s Rating: 4.0 out of 5.0

Alternative Rock / New Wave


Highlights:

Who Can It be Now?

Down Under

Underground

Helpless Automaton

Be Good Johnny



Preface:

I asked to review this album in early November and was super excited to write up an album since music 

is essentially the core of my happiness. Then my brain got involved and I became terrified of the actual 

work and whether or not, I could do an album I know of more than I actually know, justice. So I put off 

and put off writing this album up. Luckily procrastination suits me well and writing this up on NYE feels 

right for me. I purchased this album on vinyl, used, at Record City sometime prior to 2000 when you 

could get LPs for a couple dollars and pretty sure I payed a whole $1 for this album. I played it once or 

twice and that was it. Fast forward 20+ years and my hetero-lifemate Jed turns me onto this page and I 

immediately search for an album to review thinking it had to be an album I had on vinyl. I was excited to 

see this gem was not reserved. So hear I am almost 2 months later drinking an Irish coffee listening to 

the album again.


Review:

Initially, I put the record on for the first time in over 2 decades and pour a whiskey. I listened to it that 

night in November and just dug it! It’s a fun album! Fun sounds generic but there is no song that brings 

up sad emotions for me. Every song is that sound that is unique to the time it was made. Granted other 

bands were doing similar stuff like The Police, Flock of Seagulls, Dire Straits, INXS and even U2 

but these dudes brought something special to this album. 

There are a ton of instruments you hear on this album that you never hear in popular music and it works well! My only issue with the album is I have trouble 

understanding the lyrics which could be from their accent or could be the fact that working on Aircraft in

the Navy jacked my hearing all up. Nevertheless, even what I don’t understand is compensated for by 

memorable choruses that anyone can sing along to. Also, I feel like this is a Summer album, meaning it 

just plays better in the warm weather preferably by the pool or at the lake. It’s an album that is great 

background for a playful outdoor day in my opinion.


Notable songs:

“Who Can It Be Now?” – before I bought this album, I really thought that Flock of Seagulls sang this 

tune. So, when I purchased this record simply because I loved “Down Under,” I was pleasantly surprised 

that I knew the first track on Side A. This tune is magnificent! I love the sax on this song and the chorus is 

just plain catchy and something that could only have been made in the early 80’s. This song reminds me 

of The Police’s “Walking on the Moon”. According to Wikipedia this song only reached #2 in Australia

but hit #1 in the US, which is impressive but not surprising as most Americans tend to love Australians. 

“Down Under” – I purchased this album because of this tune. I absolutely love the vibe of this song and 

one day when I visit Austrailia I will play the shit out of this song while I’m there! I may even eat a 

Vegamite sandwich? This is also one of those songs that I feel you, yes you reading this, have a memory attached to this song and I bet it is a good one at that! Apparently, the band was sued because it infringed on the copywrite of a kids tune and the band had to pay 5% royalties because of it. I listened to the song they supposedly stole from, “Kookaburra”, and I don’t hear it. Maybe it’s my compromised hearing? 


“Down By The Sea” – Probably the most mellow track on the album. There is something ethereal about 

this tune, but it is so well produced and beautiful it may be my favorite song by the band. It also reminds 

me of Toad The Wet Sprocket’s “I Will Not Take These Things For Granted” which is such a beautiful 

song. This is a love song for sure, but not a young love, a matured love that is full of appreciation and 

understanding which may be why this song stands out to me now at 41 when it didn’t register 20 years 

ago.


https://open.spotify.com/album/4HDJMKkwAMVFewqfZcmf84?si=9LZEucPsRoSCNIPuDFa8Bw

The 1981 Listening Post - The Angels (AKA Angel City) - Night Attack

 The Angels - Night Attack



#546

November 30 1981

The Angels (AKA Angel City)

Night Attack

Genre: Rawk

2.75 out of 5



Highlights:

City Out of Control





“Well, that last record didn’t work, mates. What say we just try to be AC/DC for a while?


Well, that didn’t work. What is it? Are we terrible? 


That can’t be it. I mean, can it?”


It can.


They try for the pop road with “Fashion and Fame” but that feels like they are trying to write a single and it’s much ado about little. But count me in on the aggressively scratchy follow up “City Out of Control” which, along with “Living on the Outside”, (just go with me on this) feels like they listened to a lot of INXS and The Alarm. 

The album unfolds strangely, with the better tracks omg side one being at the end of Side One.

And the band continues this on Side two where they sow their heartland rock oats and we get harmonica mixed in with the rock. 

I feel this album’s order is messed up…hang on a sec…even though the US release has a different order they still manage to screw it up.


A shame. 



https://music.apple.com/us/album/night-attack/168389701




the 1981 Listening Post - 10cc - Ten Out of Ten

 10cc - Ten Out of Ten



#545

November 27 1981

10cc

Ten Out of Ten

Genre: Pop Rock

2.5 out of 5


Highlights:

Don’t Turn Me Away



I almost forgot what it’s like to hear actual songs. 

Now, before you get excited, these are not great songs. 

They sound like what you would expect from ELO if Jeff Lynne left and only a couple players were left to make a record. 

It’s mid-70s honky-tonk glam and I guess that’s fine in a Brinsley Schwartz kind of way but haven’t we moved past this?

I’ve become way too jaded at this point. 


These guys are too erudite to be songwriters. “Overdraft in Overdrive” should have been a Squeeze track. That’s what they really remind of, Difford and Tilbrook at their least catchy. 


I really just don’t like your songs, guys. 


https://music.apple.com/us/album/ten-out-of-10/1443842931

The 1981 Listening Post - Rod Stewart - Tonight I'm Yours

 Rod Stewart - Tonight I'm Yours


#544

By Jim Coursey

November 6 1981

Rod Stewart

Tonight I’m Yours

Genre: He tries them all

Allen’s Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Jim’s Rating: 2.5 out of 5



Highlights:

How Long

Only a Boy

Jealous

Young Turks


Requisite Rod Stewart Covers:


“How Long” by Ace


“Tear it Up” by Johnny Brunette


“Just Like a Woman” by Bob Dylan



I’m not sure when I first heard Rod Stewart, but it was likely when I was 10 and “Young Turks” was peaking on the US charts. I always liked the song, and it’s firmly attached to one of those fairly banal memories that stick with us for no clear reason, wafting across a basketball court in a rec center some afternoon. But I never liked it so much that I bought an album, and since 1981 have only accumulated the most rote knowledge of Rod -- I’ve heard “Maggie May”, “Do Ya Think I’m Sexy” and a few others, and could tell you he played with Jeff Beck / Faces without really knowing any of that music either.



This being the Listening Post, I chose to start this review from that same vantage point, and only after having heard and assessed the album did I go back and listen through seminal moments in his catalog. So for the most part, I’m reviewing this as a Rod Stewart noob.



Even from a point of relative ignorance, “Young Turks” alone tells me Rod Stewart is trying to move with the times. Artists approach this in a variety of ways. There’s the oblivious approach where an artist merely ignores whatever is happening around them; or the reactionary approach where they get more traditional as the world around them forges onwards; or the subtle approach, where they take a piece of the modern era into their otherwise established style. They could be more chameleonic, reinventing themselves so thoroughly that they seem made for the times, or poseurish, completely losing their identity to the prevailing sound of the day. Or they can just pump out a single or two in the modern style and tack them onto the album they were going to make anyways. “Tonight I’m Yours” is mostly the latter approach, or more truthfully a hodgepodge of all of the above, and the result is pretty unfocused and thus mediocre.



The album establishes the modern hook out of the gate, launching with two of the three singles which each riff on a different early 80s genre. “Tonight I’m Yours” is a peppy new wave track featuring a driving synth bass and Vapors-ish guitar lines; it’s a tad more punky and daring than “Young Turks”, but its lightweight vibe and cliché “let’s have a one night stand” lyrics render it ultimately forgettable. “How Long” veers into 80s soft rock with a rendition of the Ace hit. As covers go, it’s arguably not adding much to the track aside from Rod Stewart’s soulful rasp, but it is a solid cut and meets my somewhat under-informed expectations for Rod Stewart’s core sound as refigured for 1981.



At this point, Stewart does a 180, reaching back to the 50’s for some classic rock’n’roll. “Tora Tora Tora (Out with the Boys)” is a boogie with a 70s guitar sound and a shit-kicking vibe, while “Tear it Up” is a bit more classic in its approach to Johnny Burnette’s rockabilly track. Both tracks are decent for what they are, but it’s hard to make sense of what album I’m listening to anymore. Worse, “Tora Tora Tora” finds Rod channelling the average working Joe he never really was. Do we really believe Rod when he sings, “Payday Friday and the weekend's here / I've been workin' all week tryin' to pay for this gear” and “I want to talk about motorbikes, cars and things / no sophistication or designer jeans.” Maybe it would have worked for him a decade earlier, but it’s hard to stomach when he’s busy pumping out synth-heavy hits in his silk scarves and skinny jeans. Meanwhile, “Tear it Up” has a certain swagger to it, but adds more layers of confusion with an inexplicably ostentatious bit of classical piano before cueing up the main item. Campy pastiche artists like Queen could have made sense of that transition, but in Rod Stewart’s hands it comes off as random.



The next couple songs go heavy on the Dylan influence, and this is where it would have been useful to me to know Rod Stewart’s catalog. From my vantage point I would have never figured him for having Dylan as an influence, so I’m wondering whose idea it was to fit this stuff into a nominally “new wave” album? It was to my ultimate surprise that prior to “Tonight I’m Yours” Rod had recorded four Dylan covers in his solo career. But I wouldn’t know this until later.



“Only a Boy” is probably one of the better tracks here, and even with the big torch song performance it proudly wears a post-electric Dylan influence on its sleeve. Maybe it’s the best song of the album if you are looking for the pre-disco Rod. Either way, it’s followed by a spirited rendition of “Just Like a Woman” which works well enough but is far broader and more impassioned than any other Dylan cover Rod has recorded to this point.



If to this point, the album has felt continuous for two tracks at a time, the final four tracks feel like throwing darts blindfolded. “Jealous” brings us back to the 80s with it’s post-disco groove, but at its core it’s a fiery, bluesy song with a honking overdriven lead line. If any track finds a balance between the original Rod and the 1981 Rod, this is the one, and it’s not too shabby.



The magic all runs out with “Sonny”, a mawkish soft rock tune with a lyric cut from the same old Dylan fabric as earlier tracks, as Rod belts “cause she walks like you, She talks like you, She feels like you, But she ain't you.” Again, a decade earlier this song could have fit right in, and even a couple tracks earlier Rod was serving this stuff up admirably. But this one is undone by its syrupy Rhodes electric piano, stock 80s gated snares, and overwrought performance. Terrible song.



From the album’s nadir springs its standout track, but when the synthetic pulse of “Young Turks” cuts in, it isn’t so much a welcome reprieve as a splash of cold water in the face. It’s a terrible transition, and underscores the fish out of water quality of the new wave elements of the album. This is a pretty great song, and unlike on “Tora Tora Tora'', Rod’s empathy for the working class romantics of the song’s title is completely plausible. As with many pop hits, the celebratory tone disguises the darkness of the lyrics in which a young couple fight for their love against all odds and lose. As successful as the songwriting is, it’s hard not to hear the production and tepid synth pop veneer as dated and cliché, aging less well than other synth-heavy tracks of the day -- it’s the best song of this album, but far from the best of its era.



It wouldn’t be “Tonight I’m Yours” if it didn’t follow the bouncy synth hit with cloying gospel number “Never Give Up on a Dream.” For all its musicianship this track is sheer pap, especially when compared to a much defter and more moving track like 1976’s “The Killing of Georgie Pt I and II”. I can almost see Rod trying the same thing here, with “Young Turks” serving the tragic story of Pt I, and “Never Give Up” attempting the hopeful resurrection of Pt II. Whether that was intended or not, the short and sweet Beatles chorus from Pt II was far more effective, while “Never Give Up” is just predictable, overlong and overdone.



In the end, if I were to score this album based on the quality of individual tracks alone, I’d probably rate it a notch or two higher. Most of the songs on this album are at least decent, a few quite good, whether or not they are always to my taste. Rod is all in for this endeavor, whooping and hollering here through most of the album -- he is going to believe in this stuff with all his heart whether or not the audience will. But as an album, this feels more like Rod’s catalog on shuffle play rather than a single work; as a new listener I have no idea who Rod Stewart is besides being an exceptional singer. Rod pulls most of it off, but in trying to both stay true to his roots and adapt to the new sound, he creates an incoherent work, and the more Rod strains to show his passion, the more insubstantial the final product feels.



On the cover: I have to give high marks to Rod and photographer Raul Vega for this cover. Shadowing Stewart’s porcupine coiff with a silhouette of a flower arrangement in the background is a masterstroke, even if the Chevalier font is pretty tacky and feels especially dated. Perhaps Rod’s look shows dedication and the flowers imply romantic intent, underscoring his sincerity when he says that tonight he really is “yours.” Or it could all just be having a go at his hair. We may never know, but we can enjoy it nonetheless.


https://open.spotify.com/album/2TKdw00rzLxoqRcxoBICts?si=rQAc8UWPQiO9Aawn09ljXA

The 1981 Listening Post - Yellow Magic Orchestra - Technodelic

Yellow Magic Orchestra - Technodelic 



#543

November 21 1981

Yellow Magic Orchestra

Technodelic

Genre: See review

2 out of 5





This is techno-electric music for people who love The Beatles but really hate music.

I kid, I kid.


No, it’s awful.



I get it. I see what they are doing. 


YMO is off the list. This isn’t rock. This is aggressively ambient rave music waiting for people to start taking Mollie. 


I never need to hear another Yellow Magic Orchestra album again. And if anyone tries to convince me that I have to I will pull the plug on The Listening Post forever.


I will never be high enough to like this annoyance. 


https://music.apple.com/us/album/technodelic/1291841190



Rebuttal by Stephen Lam



Yellow Magic Orchestra

Technodelic

Genre: Swimming in a Pool of 12-bit Samplers

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Highlights: Seoul Music, Light in Darkness, Key

——

I thought it was odd that, as a YMO fan, I don’t remember much of "Technodelic".

Halfway through the first song (as part of a proper spin of the record to write about it), I thought “Why does this sound so … weird?” My mind kept flashing back to the Electronic Music Studio at SFSU, where I spent countless hours making Buchla/Serge patches, hanging tape loops, and wrestling with the DX7, the Oberheim Expander, and the Emax II sampler.

Then it dawned on me. It was the feeling when I heard the Emu Emax sampler for the first time.

Let me explain.

The Emu Emax and Emax II where early “affordable” digital samplers (“affordable” being a relative term - the Emax had an introductory price of $4K and up). Like many first-generation digital samplers, the resolution was crude. The Emax sampled at 12-bit mono (CD-quality audio is 16-bit stereo, most modern samplers sample at 24-bit) and stored the samples as 8-bit files. The Emax II sampled at 16-bit, but to conserve storage memory (on floppies), many users stayed at the 12-bit resolution. I remember having a few conversations about the “edginess” of 12-bit samples with fellow producers/musicians back in the early 90s. There’s something about the lower resolution that made them sound rough. Yes, these 12-bit sounds cut through mixes like hot knife to butter, but not necessarily in a good way.

Why do I bring this up? The entire first song, and subsequently many other songs on this record, sounded like they were made entirely with 12-bit samples. There’s simultaneously an unpleasant edginess and a hollowness to the sounds. A quick Wikipedia search confirmed my suspicion: most of "Technodelic" was made with an LMD-649 sampler at 12-bit resolution. Moreover, due to the limitations of on-board RAM, most of these samples tend to be short.

Now, anyone who’s lived through the period of early samplers can tell you that the application of the then-novel technology came with some interesting aesthetics. There were two popular schools: faking real instruments (“look ma, I can play sax on a keyboard”) and using non-musical sounds in a musical context (“look ma, I can play dog barks in a song”). The latter of these two were basically all over "Technodelic": almost every song contained samples of atonal and/or non-musical sounds set in a relatively more musical context. With short, atonal/non-musical samples come the idea of looping: It’s conceivably less silly to “play” a pitched dog bark sample than using the same dog bark sample in a rhythmic sense. This means creating looping, repetitive rhythms using short, often atonal/non-musical samples. This also resulted in the music sounding relatively “experimental” - with sampled “Musique Concrété” sounds mixed in with more traditional musical elements.

There’s another prominent electronic group that did something very similar - Kraftwerk.

In essence, "Technodelic" was YMO’s “Electric Café” - when Kraftwerk went both digital and 12-bit sampling for the first time at the same time. Arguably, both records have that harsh, hollow, repetitive, low-res-early-digital sound. (OK, Kraftwerk fans, be gentle with me.)

Coming from the ultra-high-sheen pop paradise of “Solid State Survivor” and “BGM”, where every note was harmonized and candy-baked into perfection (IMO “Solid State Survivor” was one of the best Synth-Pop records ever made), "Technodelic" was a drastic change. Gone was the brilliant, unapologetically all-out analog ear-candy of their first few records. YMO’s secret weapon - Ryuichi Sakamoto’s Neo-Debussy harmonies - went into cold storage. “Songwriting” took a back seat to relatively minimal sample-based rhythmic loops.

This is precisely why my highlight songs on the record were all ones that featured analog synthesizers and murkier sounds among beds of digital samples. “Seoul Music” had a funky beat, a warm midrange-y Prophet 5 patch, and a very cool Shamisen part. “Light In Darkness” featured a fat analog pad and murky, non-digital sounds. “Key” even had melodic hooks and question-answer vocal melodies, which was almost Beatles-esque.

Otherwise worth noting - the rhythmic vocal “cha” samples in “Neue Tanz” was later used in the title track of Ryuichi Sakamoto’s solo album “Neo Geo”, and was explained as Sakamoto’s version of the Balinese Monkey Chant. “Neo Geo” also featured a near-identical drum beat to “Seoul Music”. Also worth noting: after “Technodelic”, YMO went back to a more melodic, harmonized, song-based approach (while still using the new sampling technology) on “Naughty Boys”.

“Technodelic”, to me, was a transitional record. It was their reaction to the digital revolution in sampling and production. Is “Technodelic” crap? Well, is “Electric Café” crap? If Kraftwerk was allowed to make “Electric Café”, why wasn’t YMO allowed to make “Technodelic”?

In all honesty, this was not my favorite YMO record. It ain’t “Solid State Survivor” or “BGM” but, in hindsight, it was an important transitional record for YMO, and the boys have made use of sampling technology in their subsequent solo careers in far more sophisticated ways (in as early as 1985, on Sakamoto’s experimental dance score “Esperanto”). In the old days, when record companies were more interested in nurturing artists, a transitional album like “Technodelic” was allowed to be released, perhaps as a general effort to showcase how artists could grow in time. In 2021, this record might have gone straight to trash.

The 1981 Listening Post - The Diagram Brothers - Some Marvels of Modern Science

 The Diagram Brothers - Some Marvels of Modern Science



#542

November 1981

The Diagram Brothers

Some Marvels of Modern Science

Genre: Self-indulgent post-rock

4 out of 5




Highlights:

Seals/Fur Coats

Put It in a Bigger Box

Mindless Aggression




"We called the music 'Discordo'. The music was made to a strict formula or set of rules. All the guitar chords were based on discordant notes, all the beats were very simple rock or disco, and all the words were very very straightforward and down to earth."



Translation: We are wasting mum & dad’s money to stave off having to get real jobs but we don’t care if anyone buys our shit. 


Take what I love about Gone and marry it to a genuine post-rock aesthetic and you get this weird Jazz/Punk (Junk?) hybrid. A lot of bands are trying their hands at breaking the norms in 81. It feels as though, even if the music fails a lot of the time, 1981 was a seminal turning point in “rock” music. No one knew exactly where they wanted to go, DIY of Daniel Johnston, glam metal of Hagar, new-metal of the new sabbath and Metallica or jazz of Gone and soon, RHCP, but there is so much experimentation that it’s hard to keep up. 


Lyrically this is barely university level punk poetry but marrying it to the bizarre music sort of makes it all work.





https://music.apple.com/us/album/some-marvels-of-modern-science-singles-remastered/305310378


The 1981 Listening Post - The Cars - Shake It Up

 The Cars - Shake It Up


#541

November 6 1981

By Lori Alley

The Cars 

Shake It Up

Genre: New Wave 

Allen’s Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Rating 3 ish out of 5


Highlights: 

Since You’re Gone 

I’m Not the One 

A Dream Away 


Clunker: Cruiser 



I’m kind of bossy so I’m going to tell you the optimum way to fall in love with this album: Imagine you’re in the fall of your senior year, and you’ve pretty much had just about enough of high school, and your damn parents. You might spend most mornings trying to decide what to wear (while listening to the The Cars on vinyl) and lamenting the fact that nothing looks very good because your thighs are just WRONG (did I HAVE to eat the whole bag of salt n’ vinegar chips? And what’s that on my face????). Your uncle went to Florida on vacation and he left his beater shift stick Subaru in your driveway. Yeah, it has a cassette player. Yeah, you can’t really drive a stick shift. But there’s NO WAY you can handle taking the bus again. You choose, maybe Bowie, no….Shake It Up for the cassette player and head off to school, stripping the gears in this car and starting to feel better since, hey, it’s THE CARS AND YOU’RE DRIVING YOURSELF TO SCHOOL!!!!! Once you pull into the high school parking lot, you’re feeling better than your usual low-grade moderate depression that nobody ever really notices and head into Algebra class with Since You’re Gone in your head. 


I mean, that’s not the ONLY way to listen but I recommend it because I’m listening to it now and it doesn’t quite have the same punch. STILL! What was it about The Cars that was so appealing back then? Honestly, I’d like to write them a love letter, they way you might to your first love who sort of just faded away. “Dear The Cars, thanks for all of the memories. You were more important to me than you know.” Something like that. I think this is the answer: They manage to make catchy love songs sound somehow dark, dour, dangerous. Look, you wouldn’t think a song called “Shoo Be Doo” (from Candy-O) would sound foreboding, but you’d be wrong. That’s quite an appeal for a teenager, this is music that was edgy for it’s time, it had a new dark, VERY DREAMY sound but the lyrics and the romance and the catchiness of the hook combined for something that was really upbeat at the same time. Just like teenager-ness feels. When one Cars song has a dirgelike beginning, don’t give up! Before you know it there’s a super catchy fun turnaround of attitude and all of a sudden it’s fun! Want to dance? It’s like they say about the weather in Maine, “if you don’t like it just wait a few minutes.” ( A Dream Away is a great example of this). 


This album seems like it might be a contract obligation, although I can’t prove this. It’s produced by the ultra-prolific Roy Thomas Baker (no, not the guy in Hud). He practically produced every single album in the world. Okay, that’s an exaggeration but from Cheap Trick to Devo, he’s your guy. It’s the 4th studio album and doesn’t really have the energy of the first two. It’s ALMOST lounge -esque. But that’s okay, they didn’t sell their souls or anything. The radio hit was of course, Shake It Up with the unfortunate choice of Cruiser for the B side. Was this a cry for help? Why do they always do that?????? 


No matter what you think of The Cars you have to admit they were the essential 80’s band. They had the look, the dark guy (Ocasek who marries the beautiful model), the blonde guy (Orr) and the nerdy guy (Elliot something…) . Hey, wait a minute, am I describing Wayne’s World? To sum this album up, it’s well produced, great lyrics, songs all together so-so. Some gems in the mix, mostly parts of songs that are good. I wouldn’t say this is their most consistent album, but I still consider it good driving music- not too challenging, not too distracting but interesting enough. And with all the choices out there, I guess that’s saying something.


https://open.spotify.com/album/4lDlCfyIhAXwP3hO2GVUaw?si=q71w6OBIScuOEUhzu4U1Yg

The 1981 Listening Post - Agent Orange - Living in Darkness

 Agent Orange - Living in Darkness


#540

November 19 1981 LISTENING POST ADMIN DISCOVERY

Agent Orange

Living in Darkness

Genre: Rock

4.75 out of 5



Highlights:

Too Young to Die

Everything Turns Grey

No Such Thing



A big discovery for me has been Agent Orange. Yes, I admit it. I was not an AO fan before this project. I had never heard them. I don’t know why or how they escaped my suburban jewish kid grasp.

This record is a laser focused assault that defies the year it was released. 

There isn’t a bad track on it and the cover of “Miserlou” is so unrecognizable that I would have thought they wrote it.

“No Such Thing” is a Strawberry Alarm Clock tune on amphetamines and that’s what this is. Steeped in late 60s psychedelia but updated in a way to sound fresh in 1981 and 2021.

It’s short. It’s 20 minutes. But that just means I get to play it twice and not feel like I’ve got to get to the next album.





https://music.apple.com/us/album/living-in-darkness-40th-anniversary-edition/168416188