Friday, September 12, 2008

listening Post: Aerosmith - Rock in a Hard Place

Halfway through the Aerosmith catalog we finally reach the '80s......



Aerosmith - Rock in a Hard Place - 1982 (buy it)

Joe Perry takes his big licks and leaves the band for his own form of superstardom. Anyone remember The Joe Perry Project? Yeah, yeah, but do you own the music? Didn't think so.
Then Brad Whitford leaves and takes HIS riffs with him somewhere during the making of this album.
Not a very auspicious beginning to the new decade for Tyler, et al.
Now, to be fair, the '80s were a difficult time for big, loud rock. Sure, AC/DC's Back in Black was a monster but that was the end of the era. By the time this album came out, we had already dealt with Punk, New Wave and the cresting of an R&B avalanche on the horizon. I don't think there really was a place for this record to begin with.
Not that Aerosmith has ever really broken any real ground, anyway.
All that said, Rock in a Hard Place is easily the band's best work since Rocks.
It's pretty generic stuff, but it isn't as crass as some of the last work. It's dirty (Jailbait) and, at times, experimental (Prelude to Joanie & Joanie's Butterfly), and it's got something that the last two records didn't: A need to prove itself. Tyler and the boys don't fully succeed on that level, but they get damned close. "Bolivian Ragamuffin" & "Lightning Strikes" are closer to form than they band has been in about a half decade. In fact, I would put Bolivian in the top 20 of the band's tracks....so far.
There are the tired and rote attempts at big band blooze, like the title track and, more so, the closer, "Push Comes to Shove", which both fail but are nowhere near the abortion that is the band's cover of "Cry Me A River".
All told, Rock in a Hard Place is no Rocks but it's not the worst thing I've heard from the band, or from most bands, actually.

Grade: B
A Side: Lightning Strikes
BlindSide: Jailbait, Bolivian Ragamuffin, Bitches Brew & the Joanie Suite
DownSide: Cry Me A River. Yipes.

Listening Post: Aerosmith - Night in the Ruts

We continue the journey (hey! Journey! Maybe......) of blues/rock with the boys from Boston.



Aerosmith - Night in the Ruts - 1979 (buy it)




Night in the Ruts (Right in the Nuts, get it? Huh? Actually I didn't until just now.....damn, I hate being stupid.) starts off with a big, lick heavy blues breaker that sounds dangerously similar at times to Draw The Line. "No Surprize" gets things rolling and gave me hope. Hope that maybe the energy, the sweaty, take no prisoners attitude of Rocks and Toys in the Attic would be back.
And it does.
For three songs.
Chiquita and the cover Remember (Walkin in the Sand) drive this thing and then...and then......
"Cheese Cake".
Oh, dear me.
Let's talk about the music before we get to the content.
A blatantly faux-sleaze/blues piece at best. Not impossible to listen to, just difficult. But then you get to that chorus. "Got my fingers in the pie" No. No, no, no. Porn rock. If Warrant can be castigated for "Cherry Pie" then Aerosmith needs to be taken to task for this one. I'm no prude. I loves me some porn. Classic, gonzo, 120 second blasts (he he he, he said "blasts") on XTube. Great. But this isn't porn. It's giggling 15 year olds behind the auditorium, sneaking cigarettes, shoving their fingers in your face and telling you to "Smell." because he just made out with the school slut.
It's bad. Bad bad bad.
The album doesn't really recover after that. It settles into a pretty slo-blooze vibe and I guess that I should appreciate that on say, "Reefer Headed Woman", (Another cover) but I'm so exhausted by that point that I don't know how I'm supposed to react.
Night in the Ruts just isn't fun. The closing rock ballad, obligatory by now, "Mia" can't save this thing. It just goes down in a blaze of "has-been".

Grade C-
A Side: No Surprize
BlindSide: Chiquita & Remember
Downside: Cheese Cake.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

What is the most dangerous person on the planet?

A dumb person who thinks they're smart. Smarter than you and above reproach.
Watching Sarah Palin I was struck by how much she reminded me of my ex-wife. A woman who once responded to the request of the fire department to cut 6 foot high dry brush as it was a fire hazard with an indignant "Who the fuck are they to tell me what I have to do?!?"

Incredible.

And watching Palin I realized the cadence in her voice, the constant repetition of Gibson's first name, (almost an act of pedantic behavior), and the attempt to use multi-syllabic words to appear smart, no matter how phonetic the pronunciation (especially sad when butted up against words like "nuculer") was something I was very familiar with:

A moron who believes they are smarter than you.
i.e. The most dangerous person in the world.

Watch for yourself.



Be afraid, America. Be very afraid.

listening Post: Aerosmith - Draw the Line

A break from politics....which really busted up my music appreciation summer...and back to the catalog of Aerosmith.



Aerosmith - Draw the Line - 1977 (Buy it)

I've listened to this record twice now. Once at a coffee shop and again on a ride home. Both times I had a dramatic response.
The first track, "Draw the Line" had a familiarity about it, an aggression and jaunty and sexy sludge ride of classic rock. The production was flat and boring and ugly as the rest of what I heard of the album. And that's the problem. I 'phased out' each time. I can't tell you what song was what after the title track. The whole endeavor sounds like it was recorded by people whose audio sensitivity might been compromised, perhaps drugs, perhaps alcohol. But I DON'T REMEMBER any of the rest of this album.
When I phased back in on occasion I wouldn't hate what I was hearing but, damnit, I can't remember any of it.
Maybe "Sight for Sore Eyes" has some familiarity factor, be it that the song has been played on classic rock or it just sounds like 20 other Aerosmith tracks.
This is a sad record. No one seems to be all that interested in being here.
Least of all me.

Grade D
A Side: Draw the Line
BlindSide: The Hand that Feeds (which sounds like it was written and recorded right after Draw the Line and nobody remember that they had mined this territory already.
Downside: Get it Up. (Really? Very mature, guys.)

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

An Olbermann Special Comment

It's full of invective and vitriol. He spews and spits. I am sort of loathe to post it because it's SO partisan. But, at this time, when we Obamacrats are feeling...a little lost and like our guy maybe can't get to the finish line, I thought, what the hell. After all, I was as offended by the images used by the nazi par--I mean the fear mong----I mean, the GOP at their convention as Keith was.
It's 8 minutes long. The most aggressive part is at the very end.
I might take it down. I don't know. Like I said. I'm of two minds about whether to post it or not. I just am so angry right now.

Journalists doing their job? WTF?

I noticed something interesting today. I was at the gym and I was watching CNN and Rick Sanchez (www.twitter.com/ricksanchezcnn) showed footage of John McCain using the term "Lipstick on a Pig".
Then I watched as Contessa Brewer on MSNBC wouldn't let a question of hers go unanswered and spun.
Then I saw Norah O'Donnell do the same thing.

Then I saw Chris Matthews hold up a book written by McCain's Strategist called, of all things, "Lipstick on a Pig."
I know, I know, MSNBC is in the tank for the left. This isn't about that (although is it so bad to have a leftist version of FOX?)
This is about journalists refusing to let the spinmeisters have control.
When a journalist asks a question and the political hack answers by changing the subject it is the DUTY of the journalist to point that out and bring it back to the question.
It's not bad journalism.When they let the spinners change the subject then they may as well be handing them a platform for their talking points.
This time, today, four journalists got it right.

I need to get out more.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans made simple.

Republican: I want to talk to you about the differences between the parties but first you need to know: You're an Asshole.

You: What?

R: You're an asshole. We'll get to the topic but first I need you to understand that you are an asshole and a moron. Got it?

You: Huh? Um...

R: Shut up. You're stupid. When you understand that we can continue. Got it?

You: Yeah, I think...When you say, stupid...

R: Shut up, dick. Okay. Now that we've established that you're an asshole we can have this converstaion.

___________________________

Democrat: I want to talk to you about the differences between the parties but first you need to know: You're an Asshole.

You: What?

D: You have to understand, you're an asshole. That's okay. I can be an asshole too, sometimes. I understand.

You: You mean...

D: Yes. Right now I'm not the asshole, you are, but sometimes I am the asshole and I can empathize. In fact, let's just say, for the sake of argument, that I AM being an asshole right now.

You: But you're not?

D: You know what? I am. There. I said it. I'm not as much of an asshole as you but I am sort of being one right now and I get it. Okay? So, let's talk about this. Together. Like a pair of stupid assholes.

You: Um....okay.

D: Oh, yeah. Vote for me? Please?

There you have it.

The Real Swift Boat.

What is the definition of insanity? To do something over and over again and expect a different result, right?

How about to respond gently and dismissive to a media machine that knows how to create sound bytes, alter the story and shift the focus? That would be insane, right? Given that it would be the third time in a row that a democrat made that his response.

Isn’t that what we were hoping Barack Obama would NOT do? Isn’t he supposed to be savvy and smart and “get it”? Then why is he fumfering through answers on Olbermann and O’Reilly? Why isn’t he reclaiming his Change mantra?

It isn’t enough to laugh at their tactics to a crowd of fellow-thinkers. Obama needs to call the liars on the carpet when they don’t tell the truth. Not act as though he (and, subsequently, we) are above the fray.

We are. We are better than that.

The trouble is, the focused targets of the message, the disenfranchised evangelicals and sockey moms, are not. They like being in power. They like being right. And the new McCain message plays right to that.

It will stick. If we let it.

We can’t sit around waiting for Swift Boat ads. You know why?

Because Sarah Palin IS the swift boat.

The conversation isn’t about health care. It isn’t about the economy. It isn’t about issues. But, most importantly, it isn’t about MCCAIN.

Not anymore.

“They didn’t want to run against Muskie. Look who they’re running against….”
Have we learned nothing in 30+ years? Why don’t you dig out that old VHS copy of All The President’s Men and bone up on how these people work? Because nothing has changed.

The Republicans, in a masterstroke, have changed the conversation. They have used advertising, doublespeak, lies, theatrics, and made it happen.
All we are talking about is this kooky governor. This would be fine if:
A) She were running for president. She’s not, so she’s not the story.
B) We were talking about her in regards to the poor, desperate decision making of a would be president.
But we’re not. We’re in love with the narrative. And we need to stop because we are going to lose. And I think that this election is dangerously important. Obama represents everything that the other side does not: hope, intelligence, charisma, world-view, unity. If he loses then what chance do we really have?
How can the third lowest ranking Annapolis grad beat out the first African American on the Harvard Law Review? What has happened to our country?

I have a message for Barack.

Yo, Barry. I WANT to volunteer. I did phone banking just the other day. I want to go in there and fight for you. But you gotta fight for me. For us. You gotta find a way to shut this down. You said you know how to throw a jab or two when it’s needed.
Do it.

In the end they will be talking about how Sarah Palin changed the conversation, the democrats never got traction because they didn’t respond in time or in kind and, years from now, your position as Law Professor at some Ivy League school will trump your status as the man who almost changed the world.

Damn it, man. Make me want to canvas. Make me WANT to fight for you! I’m so tired of losing to this. If we lost to the better person, great, I demur. But we are losing to Mad Men. We are losing to better branding. They are turning us into New Coke when it is clear that they are the old Coke in a different can.

My head is spinning. I saw a comment on some blog the other day imploring the same thing and adding, “Don’t make Jon Stewart do all the heavy lifting.”

He’s right. But you can take something from Jon. Take that side by side comparison of the acceptance speech last week and Bush’s ’00 speech. The one where the two of them were saying THE EXACT SAME THINGS. That will hammer your message home. That will shut down the “McCain as change” argument. Because how can you argue with it?

It’s their own words.

Use them. Do it now. Before it’s too late.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Volunteering for Obama

I'm 40 calls in phone banking for BO. The script is really just to determine who people are voting for and if they want more info, we'll send that.
So far?
One answer. An 80 year old supporter on oxygen.
38 no answers
And, believe it or not:
One busy signal.
What year is it in Nevada?


Update:
66 calls
62 No answers/wrong numbers
3 humans - 1. "1000% Obama!" 2. "We're Republicans and we're voting McCain. Thank you." 3. "Obama....."
The third woman was great. had no idea there are any Obama offices in her neighborhood. Gave her email. Was interested in volunteering.
All told. Not a bad first hour.
And yes,
1 busy signal.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Sarah Palin. Capturing the imagination of the next generation?

Zoe loves stickers.
Zoe loves to say "No-o-o!"
Zoe loves to eat peas.
She loves to sit on the counter while I cook.
She loves to dance.
She loves balloons.
But nothing seems to have fascinated my daughter as much as the Sarah Palin issue of Time Magazine.






God help me.